A critical assessment of Mus musculus gene function prediction using integrated genomic evidence

Subscribe to email list

Please select the email list(s) to which you wish to subscribe.

You are here

A critical assessment of Mus musculus gene function prediction using integrated genomic evidence

TitleA critical assessment of Mus musculus gene function prediction using integrated genomic evidence
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2008
AuthorsPena-Castillo, L, Tasan, M, Myers, CL, Lee, H, Joshi, T, Zhang, C, Guan, Y, Leone, M, Pagnani, A, Kim, WKyu, Krumpelman, C, Tian, W, Obozinski, G, Qi, Y, Mostafavi, S, Lin, GNing, Berriz, GF, Gibbons, FD, Lanckriet, G, Qiu, J, Grant, C, Barutcuoglu, Z, Hill, DP, Warde-Farley, D, Grouios, C, Ray, D, Blake, JA, Deng, M, Jordan, MI, Noble, WS, Morris, Q, Klein-Seetharaman, J, Bar-Joseph, Z, Chen, T, Sun, F, Troyanskaya, OG, Marcotte, EM, Xu, D, Hughes, TR, Roth, FP
JournalGENOME BIOLOGY
Volume9
PaginationS2
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1474-760X
AbstractBackground: Several years after sequencing the human genome and the mouse genome, much remains to be discovered about the functions of most human and mouse genes. Computational prediction of gene function promises to help focus limited experimental resources on the most likely hypotheses. Several algorithms using diverse genomic data have been applied to this task in model organisms; however, the performance of such approaches in mammals has not yet been evaluated. Results: In this study, a standardized collection of mouse functional genomic data was assembled; nine bioinformatics teams used this data set to independently train classifiers and generate predictions of function, as defined by Gene Ontology (GO) terms, for 21,603 mouse genes; and the best performing submissions were combined in a single set of predictions. We identified strengths and weaknesses of current functional genomic data sets and compared the performance of function prediction algorithms. This analysis inferred functions for 76% of mouse genes, including 5,000 currently uncharacterized genes. At a recall rate of 20%, a unified set of predictions averaged 41% precision, with 26% of GO terms achieving a precision better than 90%. Conclusion: We performed a systematic evaluation of diverse, independently developed computational approaches for predicting gene function from heterogeneous data sources in mammals. The results show that currently available data for mammals allows predictions with both breadth and accuracy. Importantly, many highly novel predictions emerge for the 38% of mouse genes that remain uncharacterized.
DOI10.1186/gb-2008-9-s1-s2