Personalized activity index, a new safety monitoring tool for multiple sclerosis clinical trials

Subscribe to email list

Please select the email list(s) to which you wish to subscribe.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA

Enter the characters shown in the image.

User menu

You are here

Personalized activity index, a new safety monitoring tool for multiple sclerosis clinical trials

TitlePersonalized activity index, a new safety monitoring tool for multiple sclerosis clinical trials
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsZhao, Y, Kondo, Y, Traboulsee, A, Li, DKB, Riddehough, A, Petkau, AJ
JournalMultiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical
Volume1
Pagination1-15
Keywordscontrast-enhancing lesions, MRI, multiple sclerosis, safety monitoring in clinical trials
Abstract

Background An abnormal increase of contrast-enhancing lesion (CEL) counts on frequent MRIs is interpreted as a signal of potential worsening in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials. We demonstrate the utility of the MR personalized activity index (MR-pax) to identify such increases. Methods We analyzed a previous Phase II study in relapsing patients (n = 167) with MRIs at screening, baseline and months 1–6. We performed five consecutive reviews at 90-day intervals. At each review, we evaluate the MR-pax for each patient and also identify those who meet the rule-of-five (an ad-hoc guideline currently in use). To evaluate its clinical relevance, we assess the relation between having a small MR-pax (≤0.05; indicating an unexpected CEL increase) and relapse status in the 12 weeks post-review. Results Of the 399 patient reviews, 35 cases met the rule-of-five; 35 had an MR-pax ≤ 0.05; 18 met both criteria. The proportions experiencing clinical relapse are 63% among those meeting the rule-of-five, 61% among those with MR-pax ≤0.05, and 83% for those meeting both criteria, more than double the rate of those meeting neither criterion (40%). Conclusion A guideline combining this new personalized index and the existing threshold-based criterion is able to better identify patients with a higher risk of experiencing relapses.

URLhttp://mso.sagepub.com/content/1/2055217315577829
DOI10.1177/2055217315577829