Predictors of sexual desire disorders in women

Subscribe to email list

Please select the email list(s) to which you wish to subscribe.

User menu

You are here

Predictors of sexual desire disorders in women

TitlePredictors of sexual desire disorders in women
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsBrotto, LA, Basson, R, Petkau, AJ, Labrie, F
JournalThe Journal of Sexual Medicine
KeywordsAffect, Case-Control Studies, Chi-Square Distribution, Female, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Libido, Logistic Models, Middle Aged, Psychological, Psychological Tests, Sexual Dysfunctions, Surveys and Questionnaires

INTRODUCTION: A historic belief was that testosterone was the "hormone of desire." However, recent data, which show either minimal or no significant correlation between testosterone levels and women's sexual desire, suggest that nonhormonal variables may play a key role. AIM: To compare women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) and those with the recently proposed more symptomatic desire disorder, Sexual Desire/Interest Disorder (SDID), on the relative contribution of hormonal vs. nonhormonal variables. METHODS: Women with HSDD (N = 58, mean age 52.5) or SDID (N = 52, mean age 50.9) participated in a biopsychosocial assessment in which six nonhormonal domains were evaluated for the degree of involvement in the current low desire complaints. Participants provided a serum sample of hormones analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression was used to assess the ability of variables (nonhormonal: history of sexual abuse, developmental history, psychosexual history, psychiatric status, medical history, and sexual/relationship-related factors; hormonal: dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA], 5-diol, 4-dione, testosterone, 5-α-dihydrotestosterone, androsterone glucuronide, 3α-diol-3G, 3α-diol-17G, and DHEA-S; and demographic: age, relationship length) to predict group membership. RESULTS: Women with SDID had significantly lower sexual desire and arousal scores, but the groups did not differ on relationship satisfaction or mood. Addition of the hormonal variables to the two demographic variables (age, relationship length) did not significantly increase predictive capability. However, the addition of the six nonhormonal variables to these two sets of predictors significantly increased ability to predict group status. Developmental history, psychiatric history, and psychosexual history added significantly to the predictive capability provided by the basic model when examined individually. CONCLUSIONS: Nonhormonal variables added significant predictive capability to the basic model, highlighting the importance of their assessment clinically where women commonly have SDID in addition to HSDD, and emphasizing the importance of addressing psychological factors in treatment.